Andrew Mwenda on Besigye’s Trial: A Shift Towards Judicial Independence

Journalist Andrew Mwenda has sparked discussions after sharing his thoughts on the recent transfer of opposition leader Kizza Besigye's treason case from the military General Court Martial to Uganda’s civilian High Court.

For years, Besigye has been an outspoken critic of President Yoweri Museveni, facing multiple arrests and legal battles. His cases have often been handled by military courts, which many believe favor the government. However, moving his treason charges to the High Court is seen by some as a sign of judicial independence in Uganda.

Mwenda, in an article published in The Independent, argues that this decision strengthens the credibility of Uganda's civilian judiciary and puts Besigye’s supporters in a difficult position. He points out that both Besigye and his wife, along with many of their supporters, have repeatedly expressed trust in civilian courts.

The opposition leader has always demanded to be tried in a legal system he sees as fairer and more neutral.

Mwenda states that once the case is handled by the High Court, any ruling—whether in Besigye’s favor or against him—will be seen as legitimate.

“The stage is set for a fair trial,” writes Mwenda.

According to him, if Besigye is found guilty, even if sentenced to death, his supporters will find it difficult to claim that the civilian courts are politically biased.

Mwenda argues that Uganda’s legal system has shown its independence through previous Supreme Court decisions. Therefore, Besigye’s followers may struggle to argue that political influence played a role in the ruling.

Despite some optimism regarding the court’s neutrality, doubts remain about Uganda’s judiciary, especially in cases linked to politics. The outcome of Besigye’s trial could shift Uganda’s political scene, as his supporters hope for justice but worry about the possible political consequences of a conviction.

This legal battle is not just about Besigye himself but also raises bigger questions about Uganda’s political and judicial systems. The case will test whether these institutions can handle major cases fairly and without political interference.