In Rwanda, President Paul Kagame’s rule has fostered an environment where servitude is mistaken for loyalty. His inner circle pretends to revere him, not out of admiration or belief in his leadership, but out of sheer fear for their lives. The reality is, Kagame’s governance is shrouded in paranoia, where dissent—real or perceived—can lead to brutal consequences. Those closest to him, his so-called servants, know that defiance can be fatal, with a chilling history of mysterious deaths and disappearances serving as warnings.

The chilling reality of dissent in Rwanda is at the center of this critique. Kagame's regime, critics say, has turned the country into a prison of fear where those who dare to oppose him—whether political rivals, journalists, or even former allies—face brutal consequences. The infamous assassination of Patrick Karegeya, Kagame’s former intelligence chief, found strangled in a Johannesburg hotel, and the multiple failed attempts on General Kayumba Nyamwasa’s life, paint a stark picture of the fate awaiting those who speak out. This is not mere rumor or speculation, but a pattern of violent silencing that has rippled through Kagame’s leadership, a calculated strategy to ensure unwavering control.

Under this reign of terror, loyalty has become a farce. Public displays of support for Kagame, whether from high-ranking officials or ordinary citizens, are little more than performances dictated by fear. In this reality, Kagame’s so-called "servants" are not loyal because they believe in his vision, but because they fear the deadly consequences of stepping out of line. The government has constructed a façade where every public gesture of admiration is designed to protect one's life and family from the retribution of a regime that punishes even the slightest hint of dissent.

The erosion of civil liberties in Rwanda is another key element of this critique. Political opposition has been virtually eliminated, with Kagame's government suffocating any space for true democratic discourse. Media outlets are tightly controlled, and journalists who dare to investigate or criticize Kagame's administration are silenced through intimidation, imprisonment, or worse. Even Rwanda’s religious institutions have not been spared. Critics point to the closure of numerous churches not as a move to protect citizens, but as a preventative strike against potential centers of dissent. In Kagame’s Rwanda, no institution is safe from being co-opted into the regime’s narrative of control.

Internationally, Kagame has enjoyed praise for Rwanda’s economic growth and post-genocide stability, but critics argue this success comes at a steep human cost. The silence of global powers on Kagame’s authoritarianism is seen as tacit complicity, a refusal to confront the reality of his regime for fear of destabilizing a fragile region. This indifference emboldens Kagame, solidifying his belief that he can rule without accountability, while those within his inner circle remain trapped in a cycle of fear and submission

The psychological toll of Kagame’s rule cannot be overstated. Critics argue that Rwanda’s veneer of unity hides a society gripped by paranoia, where even the closest allies of the regime live in constant fear of being purged. Genuine political discourse has been stifled, replaced by a system where survival depends on demonstrating unwavering, and often insincere, loyalty. In this atmosphere, the very notion of trust has been eroded, with Rwandans forced to navigate a regime where betrayal can come from any corner, and where loyalty is nothing more than a survival tactic

The "servants" of Kagame’s Rwanda are not loyalists—they are survivors in a political landscape where dissent is punishable by death. This critique challenges the world to see beyond the glossy image of development and stability, and to confront the stark reality of repression that defines Kagame’s Rwanda—a nation held captive by a leader who governs through fear, not respect.